Discussion about this post

User's avatar
H. Robert Silverstein, MD's avatar

Bill, you wrote: " ... . Our government is at war with the country’s leading universities and science is under attack, meddling with their internal operations and withholding billions of dollars in research funding. America’s crown jewels of science, the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation, are being gutted. The effects of these mistakes will be long lasting. Scientific research is not something you can just turn on and off ... " You are usually so complete thorough in your thinking, I am pleased to call you colleague & friend. However, the above is biased left wing political tripe and you need to be called out for its lack of even handedness. You are quite intelligent, but I am not sure you are match for the likes of Marty Makary and Jay Bhattacharya who now run the top governmental science/medical institutions. Their previous work has been first rate science & certainly they will protect the necessary, scuttle nonsense, and deal with universities, etc not following governmental obligations. As you must know, a multitude of ridiculous and wasted studies have been done, repeatedly funded by the government, and it is time to stop that nonsense-they will. You are acting without any knowledge of what exactly is being done--how unscientific. You should join these remarkable physicians & not criticize their even handed efforts. HRS, MD, FACC

Expand full comment
sadie's avatar

Well... considering the vast majority of studies came be reproduced I don't hold much value in China have more published studies. I'm thinking the new heads will again fund research but first they have to stop the nonsense you've heard of. Studying mating calls of South American cockroaches is nonsense. Someone needs to use ai to stop the overlap in funding that seems to occur.

A friend sells into the research field so of course sales are down awaiting funding outcomes. But in one instance the new phd person trying to set up a new lab in fairly big univ applied for a grant to study something they already studied during under grad yrs. It's nonsense that this is allowed.

The other thing I have a huge gripe about is that we fund so much of this research yet we can't see but a tiny synopsis of the results. Unless you fork out lots of money. That should all be transparent to the public... including the specific names of what was used in their methods.

Other than that I agree with you🙂 DOGE found the waste but has no authority to block it. Hopefully Jay, Markary and rfk can get on it fast so fund can flow where most useful. I would think grok et al could quickly tell them which proposals are too close to past studies to be worthwhile or if the answer was already addressed 50 yrs ago.

Expand full comment
13 more comments...

No posts